Sustainability of Return and Reintegration of Returnees in Bulgaria: Re-Emigration Index

Authors

  • Chief Assist. Prof. Dr Mihaela Misheva Department of Economic Sociology, Faculty of General Economics, UNWE Author
  • Assist. Prof. Dr Antoaneta Getova Department of Sociology, Faculty of Philosophy, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski Author
  • Assoc. Prof. Dr Maria Bakalova Department of International Relations, Faculty of International Economics and Politics, UNWE Author

Keywords:

Migration, Return migration, Return of migrants (to Bulgaria), Returnees‘ reintegration, Sustainability of return, Index of remigration
C2, C43, F22, J61, Q15, R23

Abstract

Migration processes have been increasingly attracting scientific and political attention, and in recent years the focus on the return and reintegration of returnees has intensified. The study focuses on the relationship between the sustainability of migrants’ return to Bulgaria and the reintegration of returnees. The main hypothesis is that problematic post-return reintegration may hamper the sustainability of return and encourage returnees to re-emigrate. Based on a discussion of the different understandings of return, its sustainability and the reintegration of returnees, a model for analyzing the relationship between the sustainability of return and the reintegration of returnees "at home" is built. Central to the model is the constructed "reintegration index“, which links post-return integration with the degree of readiness for re-emigration. Although the index is based on economic factors, other social and subjective factors related to the sustainability of returns have been taken into account too. The model and the index are used for analysis of empirical data from a nationally representative survey among returning migrants in Bulgaria. The analysis reveals that about 70% of returnees either have almost no reason to stay in Bulgaria (12.4%) or have a high probability of re-migration (56.3%). The results reveal target groups and factors against which sustainable return policies can be developed and targeted.

References

G Battistella - International migration policy report perspectives on …, 2018 (2018). Return migration: A conceptual and policy framework. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Donald-Kerwin/publication/327871068_2018_International_Migration_Policy_Report_Perspectives_on_the_Content_and_Implementation_of_the_Global_Compact_for_Safe_Orderly_and_Regular_Migration/links/5baa724ba6fdccd3cb732756/2018-International-Migration-Policy-Report-Perspectives-on-the-Content-and-Implementation-of-the-Global-Compact-for-Safe-Orderly-and-Regular-Migration.pdf#page=11 (accessed 2020-02-24)

R Black, K Koser, K Munk, G Atfield, L D'Onofrio… (2004). Understanding voluntary return. URL: https://www.academia.edu/download/41803829/Understanding_voluntary_return20160131-32174-5ipsj6.pdf

George and Gmelch and first (1980). Return Migration. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, 135-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.09.100180.001031

V Mintchev, V Boshnakov - Economic studies, 2018 (2018). THE CHOICE OF BULGARIAN MIGRANTS-STAY OR LEAVE AGAIN?. Economic Studies (Ikonomicheski Izsledvania), 27(2), 45-64. URL: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=695619

GC Myers - Social and Economic Studies, 1967 (1967). Migration and modernization: The case of Puerto Rico, 1950-60. Social and Economic Studies, 16(4), 425-431. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27856294

A Nonchev, M Hristova - Economic studies, 2018 (2018). SEGMENTATION OF RETURNING MIGRANTS.. Economic Studies (Ikonomicheski Izsledvania), 27(2), 3-24. URL: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=695611

Published

2021-04-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Misheva, M., Getova, A., & Bakalova, M. (2021). Sustainability of Return and Reintegration of Returnees in Bulgaria: Re-Emigration Index. Research Papers, 1, 355-384. https://yb.e-dnrs.org/index.php/rp/article/view/5326